On 14 Apr 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
> As is right, fitting and proper, they are going to anonymize the
> license. I've requested that it be rendered in postscript form (as
> opposed to some grotty proprietary word processing format), so if you
> can't render postscript (using ghostview or gv), work on it.
Fine, whatever format they want -- I can probably strain it into text
regardless :)
> They've tracked the APSL debacle closely, and wish to avoid the same
> problem. Please respect the fact that this license is not final and
> do not publish it. Also, please, no speculation on who it might be.
> The license is the license; who will be using it is completely besides
> the point.
Waiting with baited breath for the URL...
Matthew Weigel Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Operating Systems Advocate
http://www.pitt.edu/~weigel Lab Consultant
