G'day all. On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:24:42AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nobody would have objected to that message. I didn't think so. My point is that had this mailing list been called "license-review", I probably wouldn't have posted it here, because it wasn't a licence which needed review. :-) All this discussion over the name and charter. Why does this remind me of a Usenet RFD? Cheers, Andrew Bromage
- How about license-review@opensource.org? johnston
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Richard Auld
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? phred
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Derek J. Balling
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.... Derek J. Balling
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? bruce
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Justin Wells
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? bruce
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Justin Wells
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? Richard Stallman
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? bruce