On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 01:55:54PM +0100, Angelo Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I commented below.
>
> Bernard Lang wrote:
> >
> > Cf. your ptoposal below ...
> >
> > why not ... seems fair ... except it does not work
> >
> > - how do you hendle sharing revenues between contributors ?
>
> By granting them shares.
Nice of you ... on what basis ... how do you evolve it when new
contributions come in ?
> > - how do you share responsibility for the software you are now selling ?
>
> By allocating "authorities".
on what basis ?
> > - it introcuces viscosity in the sytems,... more things to bother with
> >
> > and most people do not want to bother ...
>
> I thought that is what "commnity licenses" are about.
easy when there are no shares to manage ... else a pain
> > read the litterature on libre development... your scheme is just to
> > complex ... and too constraining ...
> >
> > But since you object to free (gratis) contributions, I suggest you be
> > consistent and buy solaris or SCO.
> >
> > Bernard
> >
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Angelo Schneider OOAD/UML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Putlitzstr. 24 Patterns/FrameWorks Fon: +49 721 9812465
> 76137 Karlsruhe C++/JAVA Fax: +49 721 9812467
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ,_ /\o \o/ Tel +33 1 3963 5644
http://pauillac.inria.fr/~lang/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Fax +33 1 3963 5469
INRIA / B.P. 105 / 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX / France
Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX