On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, David Starner wrote: > > This is equivalent to forking the project at the start, unless you add > > an addendum to the GPL that stipulates that GPL contributors permit you > > to take their changes and re-release them under the APSL clone. Of > > course, then it's not GPL anymore. > > It's possible that it will get forked. Of course, that's possible with > any license that's not a copyleft. Copyleft can get forked just as easily. Compare GNU emacs versus XEmacs. -- Arandir... _______________________________ <http://www.meer.net/~arandir/>
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source Licens... Bruce Perens
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source Li... Andrew J Bromage
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source Licens... Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Scott Johnston
- Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Raymond Luk
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source Licens... David Starner
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Bruce Perens
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Alex Nicolaou
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License David Starner
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Arandir
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source Licens... David Starner
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source Li... Arandir
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Sourc... David Starner
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public S... Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Pub... David Starner
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com... Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public S... Arandir
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Bruce Perens
- Re: Draft 1 of the OpenDesk.com Public Source License Wilfredo Sanchez