On Sun, 05 Dec 1999, Philipp G�hring wrote:
> The following quote is from:
> http://www.sun.com/981208/scsl/principles.html
>
> "These important differences and other details make Community Source
> a powerful combination of the best of the proprietary licensing and
> the more contemporary open source technology licensing models."
>
> Shouldn�t we ask them to remove that, because the Sun Community
> License is not Open-Source? Or can it be a combination of something,
> which it isn�t?
Sun is not calling it Open Source. If you take the marketing adjectives away,
they are simply saying that they are using ideas from Open Source licenses.
--
Arandir...
_____________________________
http://www.meer.net/~arandir/
