<snip> > >The only other reason I can think of to get OSI approval for your >license is for advertising purposes. In that case, I guess you'll >just have to wait until somebody from the OSI speaks up. I'm no >expert, but, personally, I don't think it's worth the trouble. So you >can't put ``open source'' on your ads. Just say ``source code >available'' instead. Big deal. > >Ian > </snip> I'm not certain this is the case. I recall something a few months ago suggesting the application for a trademark on open source was rejected. Can anyone confirm this? If so it would certainly explain the lack of certifications. Rob
- Re: License Approval Process Michael Stutz
- License Compatability Jacques Chester
- RE: License Approval Process Brice, Richard
- RE: License Approval Process Derek J. Balling
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: License Approval Process Martin Konold
- Re: License Approval Process Jacques Chester
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- Re: License Approval Process Rob Edgeworth
- Re: License Approval Process Seth David Schoen
- Re: License Approval Process jcmason
- Re: License Approval Process Andrew J Bromage
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Andrew J Bromage
- Re: License Approval Process Alex Nicolaou
- Re: License Approval Process Geoff Eldridge
- RE: License Approval Process Dennis E. Hamilton
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- RE: License Approval Process Brice, Richard