David Johnson wrote: > And you're also forgetting the "idiot filter" quality of this list. Someone > submits a license. Everyone proceeds to call in the question the submitter's > ancestry or proclivities. The submitters leaves in disgust. Those that do > manage to stick around after the first two rounds of abuse end up getting a > good hearing. Let's add the idiot filter comment to the opensource.org WWW pages. That way the filter won't even have to process any input ... Please name two licenses that have received what you consider a "good hearing" on this mailing list. thanks, alex
- Re: License Approval Process Wes Bethel, R3vis Corporation
- Re: License Approval Process J C Lawrence
- Re: License Approval Process Nils Lohner
- Re: License Approval Process Jacques Chester
- Re: License Approval Process Rafi M. Goldberg
- RE: License Approval Process Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: License Approval Process Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Chris F Clark
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Alex Nicolaou
- Re: License Approval Process Brice, Richard
- Re: License Approval Process Michael Stutz
- License Compatability Jacques Chester
- RE: License Approval Process Brice, Richard
- RE: License Approval Process Derek J. Balling
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: License Approval Process Martin Konold
- Re: License Approval Process Jacques Chester