Scott Johnston wrote:
> It makes a distinction between copyright
> notice and permission notice, and says only the copyright (the Copyright (c)
> 199x statement) needs to be retained in the source code. A copy of the
> original permission notice must exist in the documentation, but it does not
> say it has to remain in force on the source code.
"Must exist in the documentation" != "must remain in force on the source code."
A requirement to reprint the license is quite different from the license
itself, which always remains in force unless the copyright holder
revokes it.
The requirement about copyright notice refers to now-obsolete U.S.
copyright laws that insisted that each separate document have its own
copyright notice.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
