On Monday 12 February 2001 03:17 pm, Matthew C. Weigel wrote: > Ssh is a good example of GPL'd code becoming less free. OpenSSH is a good > example of what happens with the GPL'd version :) "The licences which components of this software falls under are as follows. First, we will summarize and say that that all components are under a BSD licence, or a licence more free than that. ... OpenSSH contains no GPL code." -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
- Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Ralph Bloemers
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Brian DeSpain
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Samuel Reynolds
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed David Johnson
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Eric Jacobs
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Ben Tilly
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Dave J Woolley
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Chris Sloan
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Lawrence E. Rosen
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Dave J Woolley
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Lawrence E. Rosen