On 28 Mar 2001, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > I myself am uncertain, which is why I would be happier if the OSD had > an explicit statement that a recipient of a program was permitted to > run it. That seems a good idea. Also, OSD #1 says that you can redistribute "as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources" but doesn't explicitly says you can redistribute a program on its own. To me this implies that you have no such automatic right, and suggests the bizarre scenario that if you want to redistribute, you have to bundle it up with a trivial "hello world" program. -- ***** Phil Hunt ***** "An unforseen issue has arisen with your computer. Don't worry your silly little head about what has gone wrong; here's a pretty animation of a paperclip to look at instead." -- Windows2007 error message
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent David Johnson
- RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent David Davies
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent David Johnson
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Eric Jacobs
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent David Johnson
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Eric Jacobs
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent David Johnson
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent John Cowan
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Forrest J Cavalier III
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent phil hunt
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent phil hunt
- RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Lou Grinzo
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Randy Kramer
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Randy Kramer
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Lou Grinzo
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Angelo Schneider