"Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>We approved two new licenses. http://opensource.org/licenses/ The
>>Sleepycat license is BSD with a required source disclosure term, and
>>the Nethask license is a GPL precursor. Both are obviously open
>>source with no controversial terms whatsoever, but we needed them on
>>the approved list because some people wanted to certify software using
>>those licenses.
>
>Actually Sleepycat's license does have one term that caused
>discussion here in the past, and approving it clarifies one
>question.
[...]
Oops, used to have.
It appears that the license I am used to reading is not quite
the one that you approved. Too bad. I always thought that
the old one was an interesting compromise...
Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
