> From: Brian Behlendorf [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > them to do that, without granting them specific approval to do so? Note > that such an arrangement is not cool with Debian, as it would violate the > DFSG (and the OSD) by creating a second agreement limiting the right to > redistribute, as well as being specific to Debian. > [DJW:] Linux is a trademark. I presume Gnu is a trademark. Although I can't find a reference quickly, I believe the FSF position is that trade marks are outside the scope of the GPL, probably because the intellectual property is in the trademark not the actual program. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS. >
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave Gilbert
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? John Cowan
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Chloe Hoffman
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Dave Gilbert
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Karsten M. Self
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Tom Hull
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.