Samuel Reynolds wrote:
> In general, the right to *use* the work is implied by > ownership of a copy of the work, and limited to the > copy of the work that one owns. Right enough. > For example, paintings > (with a very few, contractually-obligated exceptions) > can be displayed publically or privately, sold, or > destroyed by their owners, without requiring permission > from anyone. I don't think you can publicly display a painting unless you have bought the "public display" right from the copyright owner. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3