Samuel Reynolds wrote:
> In general, the right to *use* the work is implied by
> ownership of a copy of the work, and limited to the
> copy of the work that one owns.
Right enough.
> For example, paintings
> (with a very few, contractually-obligated exceptions)
> can be displayed publically or privately, sold, or
> destroyed by their owners, without requiring permission
> from anyone.
I don't think you can publicly display a painting
unless you have bought the "public display" right from the
copyright owner.
--
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
