-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 November 2001 15:14, you wrote: > > I have been working on a software project which I intend to license under the > > QPL. I have decided to choose this type of license because I thought I could > > share my source with anybody interested in seeing it and also charge > > non-commercial users such as ISP's, etc... with a fee to recover some of my > > costs. Anybody else could use my program at no charge. > > This is the QPL. What about QPL clause 6b? > > You can charge anyone whatever you want to give them a copy. You are > welcome to change ISPs something additional. But once they have a > copy, they have the freedom to distribute as many copies as they > want, and you get paid nothing for that. > >
Thanks for pointing this out to me. I thought that I have understood all points of the license (but obviously I haven't). I think I have mixed 2 things up: The QPL and the Qt Non Commercial license. However I think that the latter is not OSI approved. Is there any other similar license to that which would be OSI approved?? > - -- You can get my public pgp key here: http://foobar.gmxhome.de/pgp/joachim.html PGP fingerprint: 25 96 E0 25 48 D9 8E 10 3C C0 48 E7 AF 5A E2 C6 A3 15 05 E6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBO/kah69a4sajFQXmEQKO3gCfeuf+UPZLvzm1MFMztq+qwpf+VkMAoJpt ddqmHj3Ajaxd3jGKqlps3rgq =UYut -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3