Karsten M. Self scripsit: > There's a crucial distinction: the GPL questions _practice_ and > utilizes _law_. The submitted "Poetic License" questions law. What it > utilizes, I'm not sure. As such, I don't see it as a license, in fact, > it says as much.
Yes, it does. But it grants the essential rights to copy, distribute, and make derivative works, albeit with much ranting attached, and as such it's an OSL. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3