Paul Guyot scripsit: > There is nevertheless BSD clause #2. It says > that if you release in binary form, you should also include the BSD > license in the documentation.
And so you must, but the license is not *effective* over the work as a whole, only the parts originally so licensed. It must be included *as a piece of text*, but there is no BSD requirement that BSD works be *licensed* under the BSD (it is not a copyleft). -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
