Karsten M. Self scripsit: > > FSF may never seek OSI approval for its licenses (the source needs no > > approval from the derivative), but implicitly any GNU software license > > is Open Source... > > Wrong.
What license could possibly be a free software license (as defined by FSF) without also being an open source license (as defined by OSI)? It may not be OSI *certified*, but that's a different thing. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3