begin Justin Wells quotation: [FSF:]
> Its adversarity, say Microsoft Corp., has different ideas about how > the GPL v3 should be worded... for example, allowing Microsoft (and > only Microsoft) to incorporate all GPL'd software into Windows. (Lawfully and with public acknowledgement, you mean. For all we know, there's plenty already there.) Result Primus: The next versions of all GPLed work no longer permit accepting the software under GPL v. 3. Microsoft Corp. finds that it has gained only the right to a proprietary fork of old versions, if it cares to maintain them. Result Secundus: The free software world immediately gains a propaganda victory of epic proportions. Which is of course why the Redmondites wouldn't be dumb enough to pursue that strategy in the first place. -- This message falsely claims to have been scanned for viruses with F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange and to have been found clean. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3