On Saturday 09 February 2002 03:32 pm, Christian Gross wrote: > I saw that too and I thought hey no problem. But then 2.2.a explicitly > states: > > (a) You must satisfy all the conditions of Section 2.1 with respect to the > Source Code of the Covered Code; > > Which would say, sure you can deploy however you want and use how you want, > so long as you use the sources as defined in section 2.1, which is defined > to be non-commercial.
They way I interpret that is to follow the *conditions* of 2.1. Those conditions are paragraphs 2.1.a and 2.1.b. The first paragraph of 2.1 refers to non-commercial usage, but paragraphs 2.1.a and 2.1.b do not. If the APSL did not allow commercial usage, then there would be no way it could be considered Open Source. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org pgp public key on website -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3