From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You don't have the APSL quite right. Clause 2.2d only applies to "Your
> Deployed Modifications."
>
> Clause 2.2d merely requires a prominent notice of the license for binary only
> deployments. It can only be triggered by the creation of a derivative work,
> since compilation is considered derivation.
I prefer this to the proposed GPL change. A whole lot. Is there anything
I should know before I write Eben and Richard to tell them that?
Thanks
Bruce
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
