Since the beginning, software works were placed under the protection
of Copyright Laws.
If we replace the propaganda term "protection" with a neutral term
such as "coverage", this is a true and useful statement--because you
said "copyright". If you replace "copyright" with "intellectual
property", that would make it uselessly vague.
It is a mistake to try to think about "intellectual property", because
at that level of generalization one loses all the important details
that give copyrights, patents, and trademarks their effects.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
