Mahesh T Pai wrote: > That one line is superfluous. That is what the statute book says. > Since it there in the statute book, this is how it will be, whether you > say it or not.
IANAL, but isn't that true only until they change the statute book? In other words, isn't there something to be said for stating your intent even if it is superfluous, in case the statute book is changed? Randy Kramer -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
