Quoting Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > They were also wrong. Oh, we *can* stretch the definition, but > inventing requirements out of whole cloth is an invitation to a party > -- party to a lawsuit, that is.
I understand (thanks to Lawrence) the reason why this could create problems maintaining the certification mark under trademark law. But I must admit I can't for the life of me think of any legal theory whereby denying certification would be a tort. Perhaps you could elaborate? -- "Is it not the beauty of an asynchronous form of discussion that one can go and make cups of tea, floss the cat, fluff the geraniums, open the kitchen window and scream out it with operatic force, volume, and decorum, and then return to the vexed glowing letters calmer of mind and soul?" -- The Cube, forum3000.org -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3