Ralph Mellor scripsit: > It turns out that this license is still *NOT* OSD compliant, > ie. it is not what those running the OSI would label "Open > Source".
Could you please specify wherein the Plan 9 license fails of Open Sourceness in its current incarnation? The complaints of RMS at http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/plan-nine.html seem to apply with equal force to the Perl license (which he calls unFree) and the OSL 1.0, with the exception of the termination-on-any-IP-lawsuit provision. I assume that the Lucida fonts could be treated as severable. -- John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan http://www.reutershealth.com Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes, Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
