> From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Forrest J. Cavalier III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: OSD Model Code -- Article 1 (Free Distribution)
> Do you mean clause 5 of version 2.0 of the Artistic License? If so, would > you agree that the proposed change, either your suggestion or Larry's, would > avoid the problem caused by the current Art. 1 of the OSD or do you think > there is still a problem with clause 5? > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php clause #5 reads: 5. You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this Package. You may not charge a fee for this Package itself. However, you may distribute this Package in aggregate with other (possibly commercial) programs as part of a larger (possibly commercial) software distribution provided that you do not advertise this Package as a product of your own. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3