On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:10 pm, Dave H wrote: > Finally, I've attempted to draft a new license, below, based as much > as possible on the BSD license. It is also slightly influenced by > the AFL. (Note: IANAL.) I'd appreciate any constructive thoughts on > how good or bad it is compared to a regular BSD-like license, etc.
Why do you feel that there is a need for a non-template BSD-like license? Is there a problem with the current templatized licenses I am not aware of? If you need to simply refer to a license by name instead of including the full text, simply say "This software is copyright blah blah blah. See the file LICENSE for complete license and copyright information". -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3