Quoting Russell McOrmond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > While the GPLv2 is not itself a patent license, it does require that > an RF patent license be applied to any patents embeded within it in > order to have the copyright works properly licensed.
I'm well aware of that. The actual question posed, however, was not answerable on account of (apparent) category confusion, and I wanted to make the questioner aware of that fact. -- Cheers, "This is Unix. Stop acting so helpless." Rick Moen -- D.J. Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
