Quoting Marius Amado Alves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > No. That would breach clause 6 of the OSD (as I think it was already > noted). That's why the SDC Conditions (www.softdevelcoop.org), a > "commercial open source" licence, is not OSI-compliant.
Please, for the sake of clarity, do not refer to examples of (plainly) non-OSD-compliant licensing as "open source'. The "Conditions of Use of SDC Artifacts v. 2" licence linked from the above URL _very_ obviously transgresses OSD clause #6. > and because your questioning indicates convergence with the SDC > philosophy, which is really simple: it's open source, but if it's used > commercially, then the authors get a cut. No, it's fundamentally not open source at all. It may be a fine and useful licence for particular objectives, but please don't call it open source, as it's not that. -- Cheers, "Cthulhu loves me, this I know; because the High Priests tell me so! Rick Moen He won't eat me, no, not yet. He's my Elder God, dank and wet!" [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3