Dear All: The Sleepycat license looks clear, short and to the point, essentially BSD + a reciprocal clause.
Qns: 1. If I genericize the license and call it say a "Reciprocal BSD" license, would I have a good chance to get it approved? (This might be useful for people who desire a simpler version of the GPL, and perhaps get into more compatible codebases as a result.) Or did I miss some other OSI-approved license that does this? 2. Is the Sleepycat license compatible with the following OSI-approved licenses: BSD, CPL, MPL, Artistic, Apache? (The FSF states that it is compatible with GPL already) By compatible I mean if I combine code with the two licenses, I can release it without violating the conditions of either license. Cheers, Glen Low, Pixelglow Software www.pixelglow.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3