[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripsit: > Treatment of independent work under GPL: > if combined, all must be under GPL > if seperate, each can be under different license
No. If you distribute a binary that is compiled from multiple pieces of source some of which are under the GPL, then all the sources must be GPL-compatible (BSD is GPL-compatible, and a list can be found at www.gnu.org), but they need not all be GPL. > Treatment of independent work under GPL + FLOSS Exception: > if combined or seperate, each can be under different license The requirement for GPL-compatibility is waived, but the source under the GPL+Exception stays that way. -- We call nothing profound [EMAIL PROTECTED] that is not wittily expressed. John Cowan --Northrop Frye (improved) http://www.reutershealth.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3