Mitchell Baker scripsit: > I believe the rationale is that > this is an acknowledgment, but a limitation on use in nuclear > facilities, and so it's OK.
Did you drop a "not" here? > Would including this clause in a BSD-license be OK? It would need separate approval, but I see nothing open source about it. A more interesting question to my mind is, would it be GPL-compatible? I think so, because it does not impose a restriction as such. -- Henry S. Thompson said, / "Syntactic, structural, John Cowan Value constraints we / Express on the fly." [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon St. Laurent: "Your / Incomprehensible http://www.reutershealth.com Abracadabralike / schemas must die!" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3