On 03/09/2012 09:49 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Obviously that is what is meant. But what it says is arguably different from what is meant. A professional would never have made such a silly mistake. And the point is that OSI can't even bring itself to dis-approve the "crayon" licenses.Fonts are not documents. What's meant is that the license doesn't apply to a document created using the font.
<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
