CC removed again. We're not reviewing a license anymore since CC0 has been withdrawn. We're either wanking, or preparing an information base for the patent policy committe.
Alexander Terekhov writes: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Russ Nelson <nel...@crynwr.com> wrote: > [...] > > Now, in this particular case, Mr. Moen has pointed to a web page of > > his which addresses Dr. Bernstein's arguments. There is NO POINT in > > copying from Dr. Bernstein's web page arguments which have already > > been replied-to. You should look at Mr. Moen's page, and address his > > I've looked at > > http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/public-domain.html > > and I can tell you that anyone with even a little skill to perform > research can find out that Mr. Moen is at best deeply mistaken. In what way? Please be specific about which bits of research refute which of Mr. Moen's claims. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss