"Smith, McCoy" <mccoy.sm...@intel.com> writes: >The FSF doesn't technically "approve" of licenses (except, I suppose, >they approve of their own licenses: GPL, LGPL, AGPL). On their >website, they list two types of non *GPL licenses: 1) "GPL-compatible >free software licenses" and 2) "GPL-incompatible free software >licenses"
I'm pretty sure that whenever anyone here says "FSF approval" they just mean "FSF says the license is a free software license". GPL compatibility is a separate issue. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
