On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:47 PM, John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > I'd like to reiterate my proposal that the licensor-specific licenses > be pushed into a separate list either down the page or off-page. > Nobody else will be able to use them for their projects anyhow. Here is > what I believe to be a conservative list of such licenses: PHP, Python, > Apple Public Source, Sleepycat, Zope, W3C, Computer Associates, EU > DataGrid, Entessa, Frameworx, LaTeX, Multics, Naumen, Nethack, Nokia, > OCLC, CNRI, RealNetworks, Ricoh, Sybase, Vovida. Some of the licenses > in the current non-reusable category seem to me to be in fact reusable > (though not particularly desirable), so I have not mentioned them here.
Zope Public License is reusable, as of v2.1 (2004): http://foundation.zope.org/agreements/ZPL_2.1.pdf -- Michael R. Bernstein michaelbernstein.com Founder - urbsly.com _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss