Quoting Chris Travers (ch...@metatrontech.com): > > Can you name a single reason why this utterly bizarre question has any > > connection whatsover to anything I've said? It doesn't. > > Yes I can. And I can tell you why it's not so bizarre.
It has no discernable connection whatsoever to anything I've said. I continue to have no idea why this very odd question was addressed to me. > Again my understanding is that 17 USC 102(b) only applies to works > which are practical rather than entertaining.... And this is relevant to what? > ...and it protects the right to copy whatever you reasonably have to > in order to achieve interoperability. I was just wondering if you had > any cases which suggested a contrary understanding. I wish you luck in learning more about the idea-expression divide and related distinction between patents and copyrights. I am not a free of charge teacher. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
