On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:34:33AM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote: > I believe that the OSI's approval of CPAL (the license you may be > intentionally not naming) was, in retrospect, wrongly decided.
To be fair, and to spread the blame around, the FSF's decision that CPAL is a free software license was also wrongly decided, as was the Fedora Project's decision that CPAL was free for purposes of Fedora (which appears to be my fault -- sorry Tom!). I believe Debian treats CPAL as DFSG-free but whether this was a wrong decision depends on whether a decision was actually made, I suppose. - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
