Prashant Shah wrote:
Is there any better way to handle changes made by any derivative works
rather than using the following sentence.
"You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating
that You changed the files"
That really depends on the objective you are trying to achieve!
I think that clause is actually there to protect moral rights (i.e. the
right not to be falsely attributed as the author), rather than copyright
rights, particularly in countries that don't have any formal concept of
moral rights.
On the other hand, from a copyright point of view, unless it is clear
who the copyright owners are, it can be risky to use any piece of software.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
