Alec Taylor scripsit: > I am building a set of generalised libraries and frameworks. > > Would like to open-source it all; however in the cases where a client wants > their custom stuff under a non open-source license; I should have > provisions for such a case.
As long as it's all written by you or your employees, you can issue it under any license you want. In particular, you can grant an open-source license to the public and a proprietary license to customers who prefer one. If your customers want *you* to engage to keep your custom work for them secret, you'll need a lawyer to draw up such a contract for you. > So what are my best options? - Currently looking at BSD/MIT and Apache; > though have seen LGPL+commercial in many places… Any of those will work. -- Why are well-meaning Westerners so concerned that John Cowan the opening of a Colonel Sanders in Beijing means co...@ccil.org the end of Chinese culture? [...] We have had http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Chinese restaurants in America for over a century, and it hasn't made us Chinese. On the contrary, we obliged the Chinese to invent chop suey. --Marshall Sahlins _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
