Ken Arromdee scripsit: > > 4.3 - Commercial distribution of the Software requires a > > trademark license agreement and you may be required to > > pay. Using the Software within a corporation or entity is not > > considered commercial distribution. This license does not grant > > You rights to use any party's name, logo, or trademarks, except > > solely as necessary to comply with Section 4.2. > > Wouldn't the "except solely as necessary to comply with section 4.2" clause > make it okay? Section 4.2 prevents you from removing the protected > trademark, and section 4.3 allows you to use the trademark under those > circumstances.
I don't think so, at least not if you interpret "this license" as meaning the trademark license rather than the software license, which I do. So the sole effect of the trademark license is to allow commercial redistribution of the software, which makes it a proprietary software license in disguise. -- Time alone is real John Cowan <co...@ccil.org> the rest imaginary like a quaternion --phma http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
