On 07/11/13 10:35, Gervase Markham wrote:
I would argue that the above sentence also establishes a precedent that it's OK for the OSI copy of a historical license to be genericized in this non-parameterized way.
Some or all of the contributors may also be copyright holders. The organisation making the distribution in question may have modified it in such a way as to become a copyright holder, but might not want that clause to apply to themselves.
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
