On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:32:59 -0500 "Tzeng, Nigel H." <nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> The wording appears to me to be neutral, just mildly embarrassing for > the OSI that it couldn't get it's act together to actually accept CC0 > or reject CC0 or provide a useful alternative for folks wishing to do > a public domain declaration. Instead it sat and dithered. I don't think "couldn't get its act together" and "sat and dithered" is fair. Existing processes for license certification were followed. The license steward withdrew the submission of CC0 for approval following a period of public debate (which I think lasted no more than a month or so). - Richard _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss