2013/11/16, Engel Nyst <engel.n...@gmail.com>:
>
> On 11/10/2013 05:53 PM, Gregor Pintar wrote:
>> Yes, it's some kind of implicit public domain dedication.
>> It's shorter/simpler than CC0, but more "professional" than WTFPL.
>> Also CC0 fallback license is less permissive.
>>
>
> In what way do you consider CC0 fallback license less permissive?
>
Sorry, it's not. I read it quite some time ago.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
