Engel Nyst scripsit: > *Not approved licenses list*: > http://wiki.opensource.org/archived_not_approved_licenses
Thank you for doing this work. > Please note that these are not rejected licenses. This is a very important point that should be made explicitly on the page. My objections to listing rejected licenses do not apply to a list such as this, which talks about licenses that have not been approved for a variety of reasons, of which official rejection must surely be the rarest. > There are no summaries of the discussion threads, and no official > positions. Summaries would be fine. I don't think official positions have much utility. -- Long-short-short, long-short-short / Dactyls in dimeter, John Cowan Verse form with choriambs / (Masculine rhyme): co...@ccil.org One sentence (two stanzas) / Hexasyllabically Challenges poets who / Don't have the time. --robison who's at texas dot net _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
