Tim Makarios scripsit: > 50 words. It doesn't require making the source code available, but > recipients of binaries will always be free to make derivative works by > reverse engineering the binaries. It does make itself incompatible with > other copyleft licences, though, which seems difficult to avoid in a > very short, non-weak copyleft licence. I'd be keen to be proven wrong > on that point, though.
Simply add "or under the GNU General Purpose License (any version)". In practice, the GPL is the only major copyleft software commons. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org Your worships will perhaps be thinking that it is an easy thing to blow up a dog? [Or] to write a book? --Don Quixote, Introduction _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss