On 3/31/15, 3:24 PM, "Rick Moen" <r...@linuxmafia.com> wrote:
>Quoting Tzeng, Nigel H. (nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu): > >> Or perhaps they simply wish software licenses were as easy to understand >> and use as the creative commons ones. > >Yes, it's common to wish that highly technical fields (such as law) were >simple. > >Very small benefit, large downside as shown by those who've gotten this >wrong. Creative Commons seems successful and it does not appear that they have ³gotten this wrong². >> It should be as easy as SC-BY-SA 1.0 with a clear english (or whatever) >> description without some debatable political/social agenda behind it all >> like with the FSF/GPL. > >A copyleft licence without a political/social agenda? I'll await this >with interest. CC-BY-SA Sufficiently apolitical for me without manifestos, widely accepted and used. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
