On 05/26/2015 02:54 PM, Brian J. Fox wrote: > It *is* right, by the definition that we’re using for Open Source.
It is very close to right. A license is open source if it complies with the Open Source Definition. A license might be open source, but not yet reviewed the by OSI. We use the set of licenses approved by the OSI as a stand-in, because they're a clearly defined set that we've carefully reviewed for compliance with the OSD. But, it's important to remember that the principles of the OSD are the core of it all. Allison _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
