Quoting Christopher Allan Webber (cweb...@dustycloud.org): > Rick Moen writes:
> > CC0 is _likely_ to pass certification if it were re-submitted > > (having been withdrawn by submitter > > <<Citation Needed>> Well, read it. Especially read the fallback permissive licence, that being the main point. It's really pretty much a classic of that form, _and_ (unlike WTFPL and Unlicense) extremely well drafted. Commenters on license-review disliked CC0 going out of its way to state that there are _no_ patent rights conveyed, instead of the approach taken by most permissive licences of eschewing comment on that subject, but that misfeature doesn't make it proprietary. -- Rick Moen "The Internet sees your competence and wisdom as damage, r...@linuxmafia.com and will route around it." -- Anil Dash McQ! (4x80) http://twitter.com/anildash/status/2897466042 _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
