Bradley said that all android applications would now have to be GPL were Google to put Android under the GPL in the last few minutes of this podcast:

0x44: Oracle v. Google Federal Appeals Court Decision
05/13/2014 07:33 AM
http://faif.us/feeds/cast-mp3/


When I read the wikipedia articles about OpenJDK and IcedTea, they don't mention this notion.

A GPL linking exception modifies the GNU General Public License (GPL) in a way that enables software projects which provide library code to be "linked to" the programs that use them, without applying the full terms of the GPL to the using program. Linking is the technical process of connecting code in a library to the using code, to produce a single executable file. It is performed either at compile time or run-time in order to produce functional machine-readable code. There is a public perception, unsupported by any legal precedent or citation, that without applying the linking exception, code linked with GPL code may only be done[clarification needed] using a GPL-compatible license.[1] The license of the GNU Classpath project explicitly includes a statement to that effect.

-Wikipedia

Wikipedia says that On 13 November 2006, the HotSpot JVM and the JDK were licensed[12] under the GPL version 2. This is the code that became part of Java 7 (codename Dolphin[13]). I believe that IcedTea ultimately uses the HotSpot JVM, which comes from OpenJDK. In any event, they all have this linking exception in their license.




Two questions:

1.) There seems no technical problem in running proprietary binaries on IcedTea and HotSpot in Ubuntu, which is what I use. Is there a legal prohibition or problem in doing so? I think not, because of the linking exception.

2.) Were, or had, Google forked OpenJDK and IcedTea, and kept the GPL, would Bradley be correct in stating that all Android apps would then have to be licensed under the GPL? I think not, there's a linking exception in the license...



thanks,

Thufir
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

Reply via email to