Hi there,

I was wondering the following regarding attribution clauses in licenses like 
the BSD 3-clause and derivatives. 

a) If Company Foo manufactures a product (think Integrated Circuit) that 
contains portions of software (say firmware in ROM) in binary form covered by 
the BSD license and then sells the product to a Company Bar that takes the chip 
and places it on a PCB inside an end-product that it then sells to the general 
public, is Company Bar required to reproduce the text of the license? In other 
words, is that still considered a redistribution of the original software in 
binary form, or is only Company Foo required to do that?

b) If one was to take the BSD 3-clause license and remove its second clause:

"2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, 
this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation 
and/or other materials provided with the distribution.”

what would happen then with binary redistributions of software covered by this 
modified BSD? Would they not be covered by any license at all? Would the binary 
executable or ROM be exempt from any type of restriction completely?

Thanks in advance.

Zluty
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

Reply via email to